Sure. If by “destructive” you mean “sometimes mean on the internet.”
I mean, while I continue to read a handful of atheist blogs (women and POC mostly), I wouldn’t touch “movement” atheism with a 10-foot pole. Because, as a rule, it’s clueless and focused on trivial bullshit and has no concept of intersectionality whatsoever.
But “destructive”? I read this whole article and still came away at the end wondering how so.
Just looks like more “good atheist, bad atheist” bickering to me, and 90% of that nonsense is all a bunch of rich white cis men arguing over tone.
- rebellious-and-resilient likes this
- existentialcrisisfactory reblogged this from liberalchristian and added:
- liberalchristian posted this